About AJEI
Board of Directors
Education Committee
Join Online 2024 Summit2024 Summit Agenda
2024 Sponsors
Protected: Plenary 1: When States Litigate, And How To Encourage (Or Discourage) State Involvement In Your Case
Protected: Plenary 2: How Adversary Nations Can Erode Public Trust in America’s Legal System
Protected: Plenary 3: Beyond the Gavel: Ethics and Wellness for the Legal Community
Protected: Plenary 4:Â The Collective-Action Constitution
Protected: Break-out 1: Ten Years After Ferguson – What’s Changed?
Protected: Break-out 2: Playing Chess: How Appellate Lawyers Can Shape the Record Long Before Appeal
Protected: Plenary 5: Fireside Chat with Former Solicitor General Neal Katyal
Protected: Plenary 6: Sound off the alarm! DEI is not officially dead—at least not in the legal profession!
Protected: Plenary 7: Sua sponte decision making and supplemental briefing: balancing appellate judges’ decisional discretion and parties’ interests
Protected: Break-out 3: Questions You Should Ask Before, and Must Be Able To Answer During, Appellate Oral Argument
Protected: Breakout 4: Can’t Take My Eyes Off of You: Transparency, Ethics, and the Judiciary
Protected: Plenary 8 – SCOTUS Update
Protected: Break-out 5: SCOTUS Criminal Law Update
Protected: Break-out 6: It’s Past Time for Real e-briefing
Protected: Plenary 9: The Ethical Tightrope: Navigating Media Influence and Judicial Integrity
Protected: Plenary 10:Â John Adams and Thurgood Marshall: Running Against the Wind to Gain Liberty and Justice for All
Protected: Break-out 7: When Justice Fails – Threats to an Independent Judiciary
Protected: Break-out 8: Legal Writing – A Workshop in Practical Linguistics
Protected: Plenary 11:Â Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: A Reflection on Its Legacy
Speaker Bios
Sponsorship Information
Optional Tours and Activities
2025 Summit2025 Summit Agenda
Registration
Guest Tickets
2025 Sponsors
Optional Tours and Activities
Sponsorship Information
Hotel Information
AJEI Conduct Policy
CLE/CJE Information
Federal Appellate Judges
Plenary 1: The Death of the Chevron Doctrine: The Future of Regulatory Power and Litigation
Plenary 5: Life of an Appeal in the Age of AI: From Trial Court to Appellate Decision
Plenary 3: R.E.S.P.E.C.T – LGBTQ Inclusion in the Courtroom and Workplace
Plenary 4: Writing Like the Greats in the 21st Century: An Advanced Appellate Writing Workshop
Plenary 2: Suter on Souter: A Justice Remembered
Plenary 6: Restoring Public Confidence in the Courts in a Highly Politicized Environment
Breakout 1: Originalism, Separation of Powers, and the Roberts Court
Breakout 2: Embracing Neurodiversity: Understanding, Accommodating, and Thriving in the Legal Profession
Plenary 7: Do Something! Ethical Responses to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct
Break-out 3: To Defer or Not to Defer: Evolving Standards of Review in the Digital Age
Breakout 4: The Ethical and Practical Challenges of Amicus Participation
Plenary 8: A Legacy of Leadership: From Football to the Law and Social Justice
Breakout 5: Concur and Dissent: When Great Minds Don’t Think Alike
Breakout 6: Advanced Legal Writing and Linguistics: Understanding “Any”
Plenary 9: Supreme Court Review: Civil and Criminal
Breakout 7: Standing: Who can Sue These Days? (And are State Courts More – or Less – Receptive?)
Breakout 8: Cutting Edge Scientific Knowledge or Junk Science?
Plenary 10: Military Criminal Justice: What You Should Know
Plenary 11: What about US? The Role of State Constitutional Rights Following Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
Plenary 12:Â Stories in Courage: Fredrick McGhee and Civil Rights Advocacy in Minnesota
CAL Dine-Arounds
Save the Date 2025
Hotel Information
2021 AJEI Summit Panelist Bios
Protected: Opening Session: Hail to the Chiefs
Protected: Managing Stress and Strengthening Resiliency: Practical Strategies for Judges and Lawyers
Protected: Page-turners: How Judges Read in an E-filing Era
Protected: The Ethics of Building and Growing an Appellate Practice
Protected: The Great Digital Accelerator
Protected: Supreme Court Preview
Protected: Clients in the Courtroom: How In-House Counsel View Appeals & Appellate Courts
Protected: Hidden Cause, Visible Effect: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket
Protected: Writing from the Reader’s Perspective: How the English Language Really Works
Protected: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, How Do We Dismantle Our Bias After All?Â
Protected: United States Supreme Court Civil Update
Protected: Curse or Blessing: How to Thrive Online Using Social Media in Today’s Legal World
Protected: United States Supreme Court Criminal Update
Protected: Storytelling for Advocates and Judges: How and Why We Should Incorporate Storytelling Techniques and Themes into our Work
Protected: War Crimes – From the Battlefield to the Courtroom
Protected: Preventing Wrongful Convictions by Ensuring the Reliability of Forensic Evidence
Protected: What Do Courts Do When Works of Faith Cross Works of Government
Protected: Top Tips for Top-Notch Oral Argument Answers
Protected: Courage: The Seminal Virtue in Advocacy and Judging
Protected: Canons of Construction: What is Their Role, if Any, in Modern Jurisprudence?
Protected: Certified Check or Erie Guess?
Protected: Legal Ethics 2.0:Â How Emerging Technologies Are Creating Novel Ethical Dilemmas
Health & Safety
2021 Summit
Registration
Federal Appellate Judges
Sponsorship Information
2021 Sponsors
2019 Summit Sponsors
Tours and Activities
Scholarships
CLE/CJE Information
Hotel Information
2026 Summit2025 Summit Agenda
Registration
Guest Tickets
2025 Sponsors
Optional Tours and Activities
Sponsorship Information
Hotel Information
AJEI Conduct Policy
CLE/CJE Information
Federal Appellate Judges
Plenary 1: The Death of the Chevron Doctrine: The Future of Regulatory Power and Litigation
Plenary 5: Life of an Appeal in the Age of AI: From Trial Court to Appellate Decision
Plenary 3: R.E.S.P.E.C.T - LGBTQ Inclusion in the Courtroom and Workplace
Plenary 4: Writing Like the Greats in the 21st Century: An Advanced Appellate Writing Workshop
Plenary 2: Suter on Souter: A Justice Remembered
Plenary 6: Restoring Public Confidence in the Courts in a Highly Politicized Environment
Breakout 1: Originalism, Separation of Powers, and the Roberts Court
Breakout 2: Embracing Neurodiversity: Understanding, Accommodating, and Thriving in the Legal Profession
Plenary 7: Do Something! Ethical Responses to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct
Break-out 3: To Defer or Not to Defer: Evolving Standards of Review in the Digital Age
Breakout 4: The Ethical and Practical Challenges of Amicus Participation
Plenary 8: A Legacy of Leadership: From Football to the Law and Social Justice
Breakout 5: Concur and Dissent: When Great Minds Don't Think Alike
Breakout 6: Advanced Legal Writing and Linguistics: Understanding "Any"
Plenary 9: Supreme Court Review: Civil and Criminal
Breakout 7: Standing: Who can Sue These Days? (And are State Courts More - or Less - Receptive?)
Breakout 8: Cutting Edge Scientific Knowledge or Junk Science?
Plenary 10: Military Criminal Justice: What You Should Know
Plenary 11: What about US? The Role of State Constitutional Rights Following Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
Plenary 12:Â Stories in Courage: Fredrick McGhee and Civil Rights Advocacy in Minnesota
CAL Dine-Arounds
Save the Date 2025
Breakout 7: Standing: Who can Sue These Days? (And are State Courts More – or Less – Receptive?)
Session description
The concept of standing to sue in federal court has been undergoing major changes in the last few years, in cases such as Biden v. Nebraska and 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (where standing was recognized with surprising ease) and Department of Education v. Brown (where standing was not recognized.) Meanwhile, state judicial systems can decide for themselves how widely to open their courthouse doors – without worrying about the limits of Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The panel will look at recent landmark standing decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal courts, and then contrast that with standing developments in state courts, highlighting the differences.
Learning objectives
- Understand the differences between state and federal standing and their legal bases, i.e., Article III, state constitutions
- Analyze the evolving limits of Article III standing, including by addressing recent landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions
- Analyze trends in state law standing, both independently and as related to developments in federal standing
Join us for an informative, interdisciplinary panel discussion of state and federal standing requirements, moderated by Montana Supreme Court Justice Laurie McKinnon and addressing evolving differences between state and federal jurisprudence as well as changes in the law of federal standing.
Dana Berliner, Senior Vice President and Litigation Director, Institute for Justice
Dana Berliner serves as Senior Vice President and Litigation Director at the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit public interest law firm whose mission is to end abuses of government power and secure the constitutional rights that allow all Americans to pursue their dreams. She oversees all of the Institute’s litigation and helps to set the litigation directions that that it will take. Ms. Berliner received her law and undergraduate degrees from Yale University. After law school, she clerked for Judge Jerry Smith on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Kasia Szymborski Wolfkot, Senior Counsel, The Brennan Center
Kathrina (Kasia) Szymborski Wolfkot is senior counsel in the Brennan Center for Justice’s Judiciary Program. The Brennan Center is a law and policy organization that works to reform, revitalize, and when necessary, defend our country’s systems of democracy and justice. Ms. Wolfkot is also the managing editor of State Court Report, a Brennan Center publication focused on state courts and state constitutional law. Wolfkot is a graduate of Skidmore College and the University of Michigan Law School. She clerked for Judge Carl E. Stewart of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Prior to law school, Wolfkot worked as a journalist in Moscow, Russia.
Michael A. Scodro, Co-Chair, Supreme Court and Appellate Practice, Mayer Brown LLP
Michael A. Scodro is co-chair of the Supreme Court and Appellate Practice at Mayer Brown LLP in Chicago. Michael previously served as the Illinois Solicitor General, overseeing the civil and criminal appeals divisions in the state Attorney General’s Office and advising the Attorney General on significant litigation. An experienced appellate lawyer, Michael has argued dozens of cases in federal and state supreme and appellate courts, including three in the U.S. Supreme Court. He has served as chair of the Illinois Supreme Court’s Committee on Professional Responsibility, president of the Seventh Circuit Bar Association, chair of the ABA’s Council of Appellate Lawyers, and president of Illinois’ Appellate Lawyers Association. He was selected for membership in the American Law Institute and the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers. Michael teaches courses on the U.S. Supreme Court and the role and practice of state attorneys general as a Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago Law School, and he speaks frequently on the Supreme Court and appellate practice. After graduating from Yale Law School, Michael served as a law clerk to the Honorable José A. Cabranes of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Honorable Sandra Day O’Connor of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Hon. Laurie McKinnon, Justice, Montana Supreme Court (Moderator)
Laurie McKinnon is an Associate Justice on the Montana Supreme Court, where she has served since her election in 2012. Before joining that court, she served as a trial judge in Montana’s Ninth Judicial District Court, serving four counties for a six-year term. She began practicing in 1987 as a felony prosecutor in the Baltimore City State’s Attorney Office, then started her own practice. She and her family relocated to Montana, where she resumed her career as an attorney for public bodies, serving as Deputy Glacier and Teton County Attorney, until her election to the bench. She received her law degree from the University of Baltimore School of Law, and while serving on the bench received a master’s degree in Judicial Studies from the University of Nevada at Reno, and is currently pursuing a doctorate degree in the Judicial Studies Program. Justice McKinnon also serves on the Executive Committee of the Appellate Judges Conference of the American Bar Association.