About AJEI
Board of Directors
Education Committee
Join Online 2024 Summit2024 Summit Agenda
2024 Sponsors
Protected: Plenary 1: When States Litigate, And How To Encourage (Or Discourage) State Involvement In Your Case
Protected: Plenary 2: How Adversary Nations Can Erode Public Trust in America’s Legal System
Protected: Plenary 3: Beyond the Gavel: Ethics and Wellness for the Legal Community
Protected: Plenary 4: The Collective-Action Constitution
Protected: Break-out 1: Ten Years After Ferguson – What’s Changed?
Protected: Break-out 2: Playing Chess: How Appellate Lawyers Can Shape the Record Long Before Appeal
Protected: Plenary 5: Fireside Chat with Former Solicitor General Neal Katyal
Protected: Plenary 6: Sound off the alarm! DEI is not officially dead—at least not in the legal profession!
Protected: Plenary 7: Sua sponte decision making and supplemental briefing: balancing appellate judges’ decisional discretion and parties’ interests
Protected: Break-out 3: Questions You Should Ask Before, and Must Be Able To Answer During, Appellate Oral Argument
Protected: Breakout 4: Can’t Take My Eyes Off of You: Transparency, Ethics, and the Judiciary
Protected: Plenary 8 – SCOTUS Update
Protected: Break-out 5: SCOTUS Criminal Law Update
Protected: Break-out 6: It’s Past Time for Real e-briefing
Protected: Plenary 9: The Ethical Tightrope: Navigating Media Influence and Judicial Integrity
Protected: Plenary 10: John Adams and Thurgood Marshall: Running Against the Wind to Gain Liberty and Justice for All
Protected: Break-out 7: When Justice Fails – Threats to an Independent Judiciary
Protected: Break-out 8: Legal Writing – A Workshop in Practical Linguistics
Protected: Plenary 11: Commemorating the 60th Anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: A Reflection on Its Legacy
Speaker Bios
Sponsorship Information
Optional Tours and Activities
2025 Summit2025 Summit Agenda
Registration
Guest Tickets
2025 Sponsors
Optional Tours and Activities
Sponsorship Information
Hotel Information
AJEI Conduct Policy
CLE/CJE Information
Federal Appellate Judges
Plenary 1: The Death of the Chevron Doctrine: The Future of Regulatory Power and Litigation
Plenary 5: Life of an Appeal in the Age of AI: From Trial Court to Appellate Decision
Plenary 3: R.E.S.P.E.C.T – LGBTQ Inclusion in the Courtroom and Workplace
Plenary 4: Writing Like the Greats in the 21st Century: An Advanced Appellate Writing Workshop
Plenary 2: Suter on Souter: A Justice Remembered
Plenary 6: Restoring Public Confidence in the Courts in a Highly Politicized Environment
Breakout 1: Originalism, Separation of Powers, and the Roberts Court
Breakout 2: Embracing Neurodiversity: Understanding, Accommodating, and Thriving in the Legal Profession
Plenary 7: Do Something! Ethical Responses to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct
Break-out 3: To Defer or Not to Defer: Evolving Standards of Review in the Digital Age
Breakout 4: The Ethical and Practical Challenges of Amicus Participation
Plenary 8: A Legacy of Leadership: From Football to the Law and Social Justice
Breakout 5: Concur and Dissent: When Great Minds Don’t Think Alike
Breakout 6: Advanced Legal Writing and Linguistics: Understanding “Any”
Plenary 9: Supreme Court Review: Civil and Criminal
Breakout 7: Standing: Who can Sue These Days? (And are State Courts More – or Less – Receptive?)
Breakout 8: Cutting Edge Scientific Knowledge or Junk Science?
Plenary 10: Military Criminal Justice: What You Should Know
Plenary 11: What about US? The Role of State Constitutional Rights Following Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
Plenary 12: Stories in Courage: Fredrick McGhee and Civil Rights Advocacy in Minnesota
CAL Dine-Arounds
Save the Date 2025
Hotel Information
2021 AJEI Summit Panelist Bios
Protected: Opening Session: Hail to the Chiefs
Protected: Managing Stress and Strengthening Resiliency: Practical Strategies for Judges and Lawyers
Protected: Page-turners: How Judges Read in an E-filing Era
Protected: The Ethics of Building and Growing an Appellate Practice
Protected: The Great Digital Accelerator
Protected: Supreme Court Preview
Protected: Clients in the Courtroom: How In-House Counsel View Appeals & Appellate Courts
Protected: Hidden Cause, Visible Effect: Understanding the Supreme Court’s Shadow Docket
Protected: Writing from the Reader’s Perspective: How the English Language Really Works
Protected: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, How Do We Dismantle Our Bias After All?
Protected: United States Supreme Court Civil Update
Protected: Curse or Blessing: How to Thrive Online Using Social Media in Today’s Legal World
Protected: United States Supreme Court Criminal Update
Protected: Storytelling for Advocates and Judges: How and Why We Should Incorporate Storytelling Techniques and Themes into our Work
Protected: War Crimes – From the Battlefield to the Courtroom
Protected: Preventing Wrongful Convictions by Ensuring the Reliability of Forensic Evidence
Protected: What Do Courts Do When Works of Faith Cross Works of Government
Protected: Top Tips for Top-Notch Oral Argument Answers
Protected: Courage: The Seminal Virtue in Advocacy and Judging
Protected: Canons of Construction: What is Their Role, if Any, in Modern Jurisprudence?
Protected: Certified Check or Erie Guess?
Protected: Legal Ethics 2.0: How Emerging Technologies Are Creating Novel Ethical Dilemmas
Health & Safety
2021 Summit
Registration
Federal Appellate Judges
Sponsorship Information
2021 Sponsors
2019 Summit Sponsors
Tours and Activities
Scholarships
CLE/CJE Information
Hotel Information
2026 Summit2025 Summit Agenda
Registration
Guest Tickets
2025 Sponsors
Optional Tours and Activities
Sponsorship Information
Hotel Information
AJEI Conduct Policy
CLE/CJE Information
Federal Appellate Judges
Plenary 1: The Death of the Chevron Doctrine: The Future of Regulatory Power and Litigation
Plenary 5: Life of an Appeal in the Age of AI: From Trial Court to Appellate Decision
Plenary 3: R.E.S.P.E.C.T - LGBTQ Inclusion in the Courtroom and Workplace
Plenary 4: Writing Like the Greats in the 21st Century: An Advanced Appellate Writing Workshop
Plenary 2: Suter on Souter: A Justice Remembered
Plenary 6: Restoring Public Confidence in the Courts in a Highly Politicized Environment
Breakout 1: Originalism, Separation of Powers, and the Roberts Court
Breakout 2: Embracing Neurodiversity: Understanding, Accommodating, and Thriving in the Legal Profession
Plenary 7: Do Something! Ethical Responses to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct
Break-out 3: To Defer or Not to Defer: Evolving Standards of Review in the Digital Age
Breakout 4: The Ethical and Practical Challenges of Amicus Participation
Plenary 8: A Legacy of Leadership: From Football to the Law and Social Justice
Breakout 5: Concur and Dissent: When Great Minds Don't Think Alike
Breakout 6: Advanced Legal Writing and Linguistics: Understanding "Any"
Plenary 9: Supreme Court Review: Civil and Criminal
Breakout 7: Standing: Who can Sue These Days? (And are State Courts More - or Less - Receptive?)
Breakout 8: Cutting Edge Scientific Knowledge or Junk Science?
Plenary 10: Military Criminal Justice: What You Should Know
Plenary 11: What about US? The Role of State Constitutional Rights Following Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions
Plenary 12: Stories in Courage: Fredrick McGhee and Civil Rights Advocacy in Minnesota
CAL Dine-Arounds
Save the Date 2025
Breakout 4: The Ethical and Practical Challenges of Amicus Participation
Session Description: Amici are subject to increasing disclosure and other procedural requirements, while there remains little ethical guidance—and some contradictory direction from judges and courts—over the proper nature and degree of coordination and communication between counsel for amici and counsel for the party they support. In this program, a leading scholar on modern amicus practice, a legal ethicist, and an experienced jurist will address the thorny ethical and strategic issues facing today’s amici.
Learning Objectives:
-Understand whether, and to what extent, ethical principles limit the way that amici may communicate and coordinate with the parties to litigation.
-Learn about the practical realities of amicus participation and coordination.
-Learn strategies for effective amicus participation consistent with current ethical and procedural requirements.
Today’s amici curiae face a host of ethical and strategic challenges. Hear the judicial, ethical, practical, and scholarly perspectives on these challenges and on how best to navigate this changing, and sometimes rocky, terrain. (Seeking CLE ethics credit for this program.)
Prof. David R. Cleveland, Clinical Professor of Law, Director of Legal Research & Writing, University of Minnesota
David Cleveland is a classically trained educator who has taught at the high school, college, and law school levels. He is also an experienced litigator and accomplished scholar, specializing in legal writing, legal ethics, and federal court reform issues. He has been teaching legal writing and legal ethics in law schools since 2005. Over the years, his teaching has included in-person, online, and hybrid instruction. He has taught a variety of J.D. courses including first-year legal writing, upper-level appellate advocacy, legal ethics, administrative law research, and gaming law seminars. He has also taught masters of law courses on federalism issues and business organizations.
Professor Cleveland is a nationally recognized expert in federal court structure and reform and a leader in the legal writing community. His widely cited scholarship includes works on federal court reform, legal writing pedagogy and history, and discrimination law. He has served in a variety of leadership roles in the legal writing community, including as President of the Association of Legal Writing Directors. He has a history of service and leadership in the law school setting having previously served as Dean, Associate Dean, and Legal Writing Director. In 2017, he was awarded the Jack A. Hiller Distinguished Faculty Award for excellence in teaching, scholarship, and service, and in 2020 he was selected for the Legal Writing Institute’s rarely-given Terri LeClercq Courage Award.
Professor Cleveland is first and foremost an energetic and innovative teacher. He is also a devoted advisor to students, often serving as a co-curricular or academic advisor and as a supervising professor for independent scholarly research. Professor Cleveland holds a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and a B.A. from the College of Education at Western Michigan University.
Prof. Allison Orr Larsen, Alfred Wilson & Mary I.W. Lee Professor of Law, William & Mary
Allison Orr Larsen is the Alfred Wilson & Mary I.W. Lee Professor of Law at William & Mary where she also directs the Institute for the Bill of Rights Law. Professor Larsen teaches courses in constitutional law, administrative law, and statutory interpretation. She is a graduate of both William & Mary where she received her undergraduate degree, and the University of Virginia School of Law where she graduated first in her class. Following graduation, Professor Larsen clerked for Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and for Justice David Souter on the U.S. Supreme Court. Since joining the William & Mary law faculty in 2010, Larsen has received many awards honoring her teaching and scholarship including the state-wide Outstanding Faculty Award in the “Rising Star” category (Virginia’s highest faculty honor).
Professor Larsen is a scholar of constitutional law and legal institutions, with a focus on how information dynamics affect both. Her work on fact-finding at the Supreme Court has been featured multiple times in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal, and was also the subject of her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in April 2021. Larsen has published in the nation’s top law reviews, and her work has been cited by four different U.S. Courts of Appeals. She appeared with Stephen Colbert as a guest on The Colbert Report to discuss her scholarship on Supreme Court amicus briefs, a subject on which she also testified before the Presidential Commission on Supreme Court Reform.
Hon. Theodora Gaitas, Justice, Minnesota Supreme Court (Moderator)
The Honorable Theodora Gaïtas took the oath of office as the Minnesota Supreme Court’s newest associate justice in a formal ceremony at the Minnesota History Center on Monday, Sept. 16, 2024.
Prior to joining the Supreme Court, Justice Gaïtas served on the Court of Appeals for four years and as a judge in the Fourth Judicial District for two years. Before her appointment to the bench, she was in private practice with Matonich Law and served as an appellate public defender with the Office of the Minnesota Appellate Public Defender. Justice Gaïtas is a 1994 cum laude graduate of the University of Minnesota Law School.
Justice Gaïtas joined the Supreme Court on Aug. 1. The court held a private swearing-in ceremony on that day.