Dear Model Code:
May I do online research on cases that appear before me? Some facts are not specifically stated in court but would be easy to find online. What do you say?
Hon. G. Oogle
Dear Judge G. Oogle:
Great question. The short answer, in your situation, is no.
Model Code Rule 2.9(C) says, “A judge shall not investigate facts in a matter independently, and shall consider only the evidence presented and any facts that may properly be judicially noticed.” Comment 6 extends this rule to “information available in all mediums, including electronic.”
If you determine information aside from materials already presented in court is needed, you should turn to the parties to supply that needed fact—not the internet, even if it is easily available and tempting.
There are a few exceptions. Rule 2.9(C) does not preclude legal research or information that is subject to judicial notice in accordance with the Rules of Evidence.
This rule and its interpretation will protect you from online information that can be biased or plain wrong. It can also protect you from the appearance of partiality that could arise if you consider information not presented to both parties.
The Model Code of Judicial Conduct
P.S.: Don’t try to sidestep Rule 2.9 by assigning the research to law clerks or court staff.
Instances of drugged driving are predicted to rise in states that have loosened their marijuana laws, and new science, case law and policies are emerging. Don’t panic—Drugged Driving Essentials for the Judiciary will get you ready to adjudicate drugged driving in your courtroom.
Offered May 22-24, 2018, in Reno, Nevada