Ask the Model Code: relationships and recusals

Dear Model Code:

When does a personal relationship demand recusal?


Judge Maybe Too Close


Dear Judge Maybe Too Close:

Good question. Being a judge can be isolating but doesn’t require a solitary existence. You all have friends, family and contacts, and every once in a blue moon they might appear before you in court. There’s a simple standard to refer to here.

Rule 2.11 of the Model Code states that a judge is to be disqualified “whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” While a judge may feel s/he can handle a proceeding fairly, the standard is whether a reasonable person would feel the judge can be fair and impartial, given preexisting relationships. Recusal is required whenever the judge’s personal relationship with a member of the proceeding would appear to an objective observer to raise questions about impartiality.

Would a reasonable person question your impartiality with the restaurant waiter you spoke with once? Probably not. Would a reasonable person question your impartiality with a family member, significant other, close friend or business partner? You betcha.

Another portion of the Model Code, Rule 2.4, states that a judge should not allow outside interests to influence their conduct or judgement. The rule also says judges shouldn’t even “convey the impression” that other persons may be in a position of influence.

For specific examples of recusals, you can refer to: State v. Wakefield (intimate relationship); Domville v. State (social media friend of prosecutor); In Re Badeaux (close personal friend); or In the Matter of Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ziegler (spouse involved in case).

Recusal worthiness is in the eye of the beholder. If it looks to an independent and objective observer to be a conflict, recusal is required.


The Model Code of Judicial Conduct

Presiding judges don’t just rule over their cases, they rule over their entire courthouse. This can involve decision making on budget complications, human resource issues, and other management challenges. Management Skills for Presiding Judges teaches communication, leadership and management skills to guarantee your court has a strong leader.

Offered Oct. 9-13, 2017, in Reno, NV

Click here for more information and to register

NJC News
Taking Fire from Many Directions: The Threats to Judicial Independence Are Myriad and Multiplying

Note: This article first appeared in the fall 2021 issue of The Judges’ Journal, a publication of the Ame...

Judicial Heroes & Legends: November 2021 – Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

She enrolled at Stanford University at age 16 and graduated from Stanford Law School at age 22. She fini...

Man teacher, salesman, student or businessman angry, shouting and swearing with chalk blackboard background
Judges say verbal attacks on them in court aren’t up, but something else is

We asked judges if they are seeing an increase in verbal attacks on them in the courtroom, and a clear majo...

New Sandra Day O'Connor Award will honor a judge for outstanding contributions to justice - first honoree is Justice O'Connor herself

RENO, NV (November 10, 2021) – The National Judicial College, the nation’s oldest, largest and most wid...

Four attorneys attending the Judicial Academy tell why they want to become judges

The second Judicial Academy for attorneys who aspire to become judges is happening this week at The Nationa...

View All News

Download a PDF of our complete 2021 course catalog