Ask the Model Code: relationships and recusals

Dear Model Code:

When does a personal relationship demand recusal?

Sincerely,

Judge Maybe Too Close

 

Dear Judge Maybe Too Close:

Good question. Being a judge can be isolating but doesn’t require a solitary existence. You all have friends, family and contacts, and every once in a blue moon they might appear before you in court. There’s a simple standard to refer to here.

Rule 2.11 of the Model Code states that a judge is to be disqualified “whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” While a judge may feel s/he can handle a proceeding fairly, the standard is whether a reasonable person would feel the judge can be fair and impartial, given preexisting relationships. Recusal is required whenever the judge’s personal relationship with a member of the proceeding would appear to an objective observer to raise questions about impartiality.

Would a reasonable person question your impartiality with the restaurant waiter you spoke with once? Probably not. Would a reasonable person question your impartiality with a family member, significant other, close friend or business partner? You betcha.

Another portion of the Model Code, Rule 2.4, states that a judge should not allow outside interests to influence their conduct or judgement. The rule also says judges shouldn’t even “convey the impression” that other persons may be in a position of influence.

For specific examples of recusals, you can refer to: State v. Wakefield (intimate relationship); Domville v. State (social media friend of prosecutor); In Re Badeaux (close personal friend); or In the Matter of Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings Against Ziegler (spouse involved in case).

Recusal worthiness is in the eye of the beholder. If it looks to an independent and objective observer to be a conflict, recusal is required.

Sincerely,

The Model Code of Judicial Conduct


Presiding judges don’t just rule over their cases, they rule over their entire courthouse. This can involve decision making on budget complications, human resource issues, and other management challenges. Management Skills for Presiding Judges teaches communication, leadership and management skills to guarantee your court has a strong leader.

Offered Oct. 9-13, 2017, in Reno, NV

Click here for more information and to register

path
NJC News
Village near the Oljato–Monument Valley in Arizona.  Ranch house. Aerial view, from above, drone shooting
This Land is Our Land? Two changes Native people would appreciate

Some years ago I was teaching an Indian Law Sovereignty class for the National Indian Justice Center in Las...

protest international activist movement protesting against racism and fighting for justice - Demonstrators from different cultures and race protest on street for equal rights
Conversations on Racial Justice

Please consider a donation to our Fund for Racial Justice. Thank you. Judging the Judiciary on Race ...

Reflections from the Bench: Raging waters, recounts and sturdy banks of law

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859) was a Frenchman who studied American society during a nine-month tour in ...

United States Supreme Court Building in Washington DC, USA.
The majority of judges polled oppose lifetime appointments

Our November Question of the Month asked NJC alumni if they think any judges should be appointed for life. ...

Remembering Judge Peggy Fulton Hora

The College lost one of its finest teachers and the judiciary lost one of the original apostles of th...

View All News

Download a PDF of our complete 2020 course catalog

Download